They’ll do whatever it takes. – How far will your government, medical apparatus and academia go to prevent you from getting real, truthful information related to COVID-19? Well, as we have repeatedly seen over the last 8 months, they will go as far as they need to go. Yesterday provided yet another clear and unambiguous example, courtesy of Johns Hopkins University:
Johns Hopkins published then deleted a study questioning the U.S. coronavirus death rate | Just The News https://t.co/P8F5vuEYHk
— John Solomon (@jsolomonReports) November 27, 2020
From the report at JustTheNews:
Last week, Johns Hopkins University published a now-deleted article explaining a study examining the effects of the novel coronavirus on United States death totals using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Genevieve Briand, the assistant program director of the Applied Economics master’s degree program at Johns Hopkins, determined, in the study, that there have been 1.7 million deaths in the U.S. between March 2020 and September 2020, 12% (or roughly 200,000) of which have been coronavirus-related.
Briand posits that the only way to understand the significance of the U.S. coronavirus death rate is by comparing it to the number of total deaths in the country.
According to Briand, who compared the total deaths per age category from both before and after the onset of the global pandemic, the death rate of older people stayed the same before and after coronavirus.
“The reason we have a higher number of reported COVID-19 deaths among older individuals than younger individuals is simply because every day in the U.S. older individuals die in higher numbers than younger individuals,” wrote Briand.
She also noted that between 50,000 and 70,000 deaths are seen both before and after the emergence of the virus, meaning that, according to her analysis, coronavirus has had no effect on the percentage of total deaths of older people, nor has it increased the total number of deaths in the category.
Note this unintentionally hilarious sub-header that accompanies the article:
The university stands by the study but said the article was leading to the spread of ‘misinformation’
So, the very essence of this article is that the rate of death among the elderly has not changed from what it was before COVID-19 came along and supposedly started killing them, but Johns Hopkins doesn’t want you to know that seemingly critical piece of information because they claim it is ‘misinformation’.
You seriously could never, never, ever make this stuff up, folks. Not in a million billion years.
Our award for Utter and Complete Lack of Self-Awareness this week goes to… – Former CIA Director John Brennan, who delivered this little ditty on Friday after Iran’s chief nuclear bomb maker was assassinated, allegedly by Israeli agents:
This was a criminal act & highly reckless. It risks lethal retaliation & a new round of regional conflict.
Iranian leaders would be wise to wait for the return of responsible American leadership on the global stage & to resist the urge to respond against perceived culprits. https://t.co/0uZhyBTM3S
— John O. Brennan (@JohnBrennan) November 27, 2020
In addition to Brennan’s typical siding with his fellow radical Muslims in Iran, it’s important to note that, as CIA Director for Barack Hussein Obama His Own Self, Brennan participated in the authorization of thousands of assassinations of foreign nationals and even U.S. citizens via drone bombings alone, and we have no idea of the total tally he racked up via assassinations committed via more stealthy means that are standard fare for the agency he led.
Brennan’s anger here has nothing to do with international “criminal acts” and everything to do with the fact that he and everyone else who served in the Obama administration detest the state of Israel. That’s all this is about.
Question: What in the hell were any of those people doing serving on the Defense Policy Board in the first place? – This also happened to little fanfare this week:
While no one was paying attention Trump removed a bunch of high profile individuals from the defense policy board including Madeleine Albright, Henry Kissinger, former House Intel committee member Jane Harman and former House Majority Leader Eric Cantor. https://t.co/vQGzk7N6Qn?
— Rising serpent 🇺🇸 (@rising_serpent) November 27, 2020
In all seriousness, why would any of those people have seats on this advisory board? Kissinger might have been a logical member 20 years ago when he could still think coherently, but Madeline Albright? Eric Cantor? C’mon.
But hey, maybe that’s why no one in the corrupt news media paid any attention to this particular bit of house-cleaning by President Trump.
Speaking of things the corrupt news media studiously ignored… – Take a look at this tweet from PA State Senator Doug Mastriano:
This was posted on our Department of State dashboard but had since been deleted. pic.twitter.com/bDmvCK0kDB
— Senator Doug Mastriano (@SenMastriano) November 27, 2020
So, 1,126,940 ballots somehow just materialize out of thin air, and you are supposed to believe that this is nothing unusual, that it’s all just a part of a completely clean election process conducted by Democrat election officials in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh with no GOP oversight allowed.
This demands a clear and unambiguous explanation from those election officials. Sadly, it will most likely require a federal court order for one to be produced, because we know no one in the corrupt news media will bother to question any of it.
Speaking of massive Democrat election fraud… – Following Pennsylvania’s lead, GOP legislative leaders in Arizona will hold a fact-finding public hearing in Phoenix on Monday, according to a press release sent out by the Trump Legal Team on Friday:
The President’s legal team will be present from DC to assist in a fact finding hearing with select members of the Arizona House and Senate and a panel of experts. The goal will be to gather the evidence that justifies calling a special session to contemplate what happened and take immediate action accordingly.
“We are pleased that the State Legislatures in Pennsylvania, Arizona and Michigan will be convening hearings to examine the November 3rd presidential election,” Personal Attorney to President Donald J. Trump, Jenna Ellis.
State Legislatures are uniquely qualified and positioned to hold hearings on election irregularities and fraud before electors are chosen. As established in Article 2, Section 1.2 of the United States Constitution, State Legislatures have the sole authority to select their representatives to the Electoral College, providing a critical safeguard against voter fraud and election manipulation.
That’s all great, but if it isn’t followed up by firm action by both houses of the state’s legislature, all it will achieve is the provision of some level of sunlight on the various instances of voter fraud that took place in the state. It’s easy to hold these public hearings – it is far harder for the legislative majorities to summon the will to do something real about it all.
Which leads us back to Pennsylvania. – A couple dozen GOP members of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives produced a draft resolution on Friday, urging the state’s utterly corrupt Democrat Governor and other Democrat officials to “withdraw or vacate the certification of presidential electors and to delay certification of results in other statewide electoral contests voted on at the 2020 General Election”.
Taken alone, this amounts to nothing more than a good initial step. If these Republican legislators truly believe that this election involved massive Democrat voter fraud – and there is plenty of proof that it did – then they and their colleagues must summon the political will to act decisively when these corrupt Democrats inevitably ignore their resolution.
Constitutionally, the state legislatures have the sole and absolute authority to determine how their state’s electors are selected, and, as we have noted previously, the GOP holds majorities in both houses of the legislatures/assemblies in every one of the contested states except Nevada. If these Republicans are convinced their elections were illegitimately conducted, then they are duty bound to act accordingly, regardless of whatever political consequences they might suffer for doing so.
It’s nice to see all of these hearings and resolutions happening – they are, after all, key initial steps in what is a long and difficult process – but ultimately initial steps is all they must become if they are to have any real impact on rectifying the massive fraud that has been committed on our society by the Democrat Party and its media allies.
Nobody said this was going to be easy.
That is all.
Today’s news moves at a faster pace than Whatfinger.com is the only real conservative alternative to Drudge, and deserves to become everyone’s go-to source for keeping up with all the latest events in real time.