Advertisements
Open post

The Democrat/Media Coup d’etat Playbook Once Again Lands on “Obstruction”

Today’s Campaign Update, Part II
(Because The Campaign Never Ends)

Holy crap, we’re back to “obstruction” again. – Every American who was awake during 2017 will remember how, when their whole “Russia Collusion” fantasy quickly ran aground on the shoals of truth and reality, the Democrat/media/deep state Axis of Disinformation immediately shifted the focus of the Mueller witch hunt to trying to dummy up a case against President Trump for “obstruction of justice.”

In support of that tactic, Democrats and their corrupt toadies in the news media began characterizing literally any action the accused POTUS took to defend himself as somehow being “evidence” of “obstruction.” The very word in fact lost all real meaning as it became just a catch-all for every defensive act, no matter how innocuous it might be.

Lo and behold, on Monday we arrived right back at that very same point again. With their initial justification for kicking off this fake impeachment scam, i.e., the allegation of a ‘quid pro quo’ taking place during the July 25 call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, having collapsed to the point that the Democrats are now pretending the “whistleblower” who started it all now apparently no longer exists, Adam Schiff made it clear during a press availability that the goal posts have now shifted to yet another vague “obstruction’ allegation.

Here is a clip of Schiff’s remarks, followed by a transcript for those who still like to read stuff:

Here’s the transcript of Pencil Neck’s remarks:

Today we had additional scheduled depositions with the top lawyer for the National Security Council, as well as Mr. Blair from the OMB and someone who worked closely with Mick Mulvaney. Both of them defied congressional subpoenas and refused to appear for their scheduled depositions, as has been the case with other witnesses who have done the same thing.

This will be further evidence of the Administration’s efforts to obstruct the lawful and constitutional duties of congress. I would also say, and we expect the witnesses who we’ve subpoenaed to come in this afternoon [garbled] to also be no-shows, this will only further add to the body of evidence on a potential obstruction of congress charge against the President.

Indeed, in the Nixon impeachment there was an article of impeachment based on the obstruction of congress that itemized each of the subpoenas the White House had defied. Well, today we have four additional subpoenas to add to the list of a potential charge against the President of the United States and his obstruction of its constitutional duties.

[End]

So, just as in the playbook used for the whole Russia Collusion scam, the Schiff/Pelosi Impeachment scam now shifts away from the failed original allegation to the catch-all tactic of characterizing any and every defensive action taken by the White House as “obstruction of congress.”

The pathological Schiff’s comparison of this current scam to the Nixon impeachment process is both laughable and heinously disgusting. There are three very key differences between the two situations:

  1. The impeachment process of Nixon was kicked off by a real, true vote of the full House of Representatives on February 6, 1974 to establish a real, true formal impeachment process. The Schiff/Pelosi scam was kicked off by unilateral decree by the Speaker, ostensibly in response to a fake complaint filed a fake whistleblower.
  2. The 1973 impeachment vote by the House received bipartisan support – last week’s sham vote to simply continue Pelosi’s unlawful process did not.
  3. In the end, the House impeachment process had identified a long list of real, actual criminal actions taken by President Nixon and his staff. Today’s scam process has not only failed to identify any actual criminal actions on the part of the President or anyone who works for him – other than the fake whistleblower himself, perhaps – we haven’t even seen anyone allege any actual crimes have taken place.

All we have as of today are Schiff’s phony complaints about “obstruction of congress” because Administration official are defying his sham “subpoenas.” Those “subpoenas” in fact have no force of law because the House has to this point failed to legally establish a formal impeachment process. They are in fact nothing more than mendacious letters that contain no enforcement mechanism.

So, we’re back to “obstruction” one more time, and if that tells us anything, it tells us for certain sure that Pencil Neck and his gang of circus clowns are stuck holding another big ol’ bag of nothing.

That is all.

 

Today’s news moves at a faster pace than ever. Whatfinger.com is my go-to source for keeping up with all the latest events in real time.

Advertisements
Open post

Sunday was NBC’s Day to Shill for the Deep State Coup Cabal

Today’s Campaign Update, PART II
(Because The Campaign Never Ends)

The fake news outlets are taking turns parroting the Coup Cabal’s talking points. – Saturday was the New York Times day, and Sunday, it was NBC’s turn at the fake news bar as the Coup Cabal continues to try to build an exculpatory narrative in advance of the release of the Horowitz report. We’ve seen this repeatedly over the past few years, as America’s fake news media continues to toady for its Democrat masters.

NBC News started its shilling right at the top, with a hilariously-slanted headline: “AG Barr expands mysterious review into origin of Russia investigation.”  Oooooohhhh, it’s all “mysterious” and stuff. The sub-head is even better: “If U.S. Attorney John Durham is conducting a criminal investigation, it’s not clear what allegations of wrongdoing are being examined.”

Oh, hey, guess who no doubt fed NBC that headline and sub-head: Could it be Obama CIA Director John Brennan? It seems likely, given this passage hidden way down in the bowels of the piece:

If Durham is conducting a criminal investigation, it’s not clear what allegations of wrongdoing are being examined. The Justice Department has not detailed any, and a spokeswoman declined to comment for this story.

“I don’t know what the legal basis for this is,” Brennan said, calling the probe “bizarre.”

So, Saturday’s theme parroted by the New York Times was that, hey, the Coup Cabal didn’t do anything wrong in the sham Clinton email “investigation,” and Sunday’s theme is “the Barr/Durham investigation is all mysterious and bizarre and stuff, or something.”

The NBC piece is an obvious, blatant effort to paint the Barr/Durham investigation to be somehow illegitimate, which explains the use of Brennan-fed code words like “bizarre,” “mysterious,” and “unusual” throughout. Of course, there is nothing mysterious or unusual about the investigation at all, and Barr spent a ton of time in May explaining in great detail why he was pursuing the investigation and what he and Durham would be looking at.

NBC even details much of that in its own piece:

Michael Horowitz, the Justice Department inspector general, has conducted an investigation into the FBI’s actions in launching the Russia probe.

But Barr has said he believes an IG inquiry is not sufficient to answer the questions he has about how the investigation began. In doing so, he made comments suggesting Durham had authority only a criminal investigation could provide.

In a May 31 interview with CBS News, Barr said Horowitz “doesn’t have the power to compel testimony, he doesn’t have the power really to investigate beyond the current cast of characters at the Department of Justice. His ability to get information from former officials or from other agencies outside the department is very limited.”

Barr also said in the interview that the purpose of the Durham review is to make sure there was not inappropriate surveillance of the Trump campaign.

“I had a lot of questions about what was going on,” he said. “Some of the facts that I’ve learned don’t hang together with the official explanations of what happened.”

Ok, so, what is “mysterious,” “bizarre,” or “unusual” about any of that? Barr is concerned about the origins of myriad FBI/CIA/DOJ-sanctioned efforts to spy on the Trump Campaign/Trump Transition/Trump Administration were improperly originated and conducted, and that no one has made any real effort to get to the bottom of why that all happened and who authorized the spying in the first place. So, he has detailed Durham to lead a probe to get to the bottom of it all.

IG Horowitz has no power to subpoena witnesses outside of the DOJ/FBI employee base, and no power to convene grand juries to seek indictments should crimes be uncovered. Durham, as a U.S. Attorney, does possess those powers.

This is not complicated, except for fake journalists who are set on pretending to be intentionally obtuse in efforts to deceive the American public. And that’s how we end up with these fake media outlets taking turns goose-stepping to marching music being played by the Coup Cabal.

Can’t wait to see what Monday’s theme becomes, and which fake news media outlet gets to parrot it for Brennan/Clapper/Comey and company. My money’s on ABC or The Washington Post.

Stay tuned.

That is all.

 

Today’s news moves at a faster pace than ever. Whatfinger.com is my go-to source for keeping up with all the latest events in real time.

Scroll to top
%d bloggers like this: