Dems Have a Terrible Debate, So We’re Back to Russia Collusion One More Time

Today’s Campaign Update (Because the Campaign Never Ends)

In terror the Boy ran toward the village shouting “Wolf! Wolf!” But though the Villagers heard the cry, they did not run to help him as they had before. “He cannot fool us again,” they said. – Aesop’s Fables, from “The Boy Who Cried Wolf.”

It’s like clockwork, folks. – A truly, desperately bad event for the Democrat Party invariably results in a new false narrative coming out of the Party’s toadies in our corrupt news media.

The Party had a disastrous debate on Wednesday, during which everyone beat Mini-Mike Bloomberg to shreds and nobody laid a glove on President Donald Trump, leaving The Commie standing as the clear front-runner, and presto-change-o, we are back to Russia Collusion one more time!

On Thursday, the fake journalists at the corrupt New York Times published yet another narrative-setter piece for their Deep State masters, this one designed to support the Democrat Party’s plan to destroy voter confidence in the 2020 election results in advance. In case you’ve forgotten, the Democrats kicked off this particular plan way back in May of last year, as it became obvious that Quid Pro Joe was too impaired to become the Party’s standard bearer.

On May 6, Nancy Pelosi told reporters that “we cannot accept a second term…for Donald Trump…if we are going to be faithful to our democracy and to the Constitution of the United States. And that is just a fact.” Thus, she was already telegraphing her Party’s intent to destroy faith in the 2020 elections and to refuse to accept their results. That theme has been an ever-present part of Democrat Party/media messaging since that time, and was the main theme in the idiotic impeachment effort that held our country hostage for five long months.

Also participating in this neverending coup d’etat effort is our intelligence community, as we well know. The Times piece in question focuses on a briefing that outgoing Acting Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Joseph Maguire held on Capitol Hill recently, in which he and a whole passel of his loyal lieutenants informed congress of their belief that – get this – the “Russians” favor President Trump’s re-election over communist Bernie Sanders, and are already working to help Mr. Trump’s cause.

Oh yeah, sure, that’s totally believable. You betcha.

Nowhere in the Times piece will you find a single smidgen of detail about exactly what it is that Maguire claims the “Russians” (why doesn’t he just say it’s the boogeyman instead – it would have equal credibility at this point) are doing to “help” the Trump campaign. That would be because the “Russians” aren’t really doing anything in any organized fashion to do that, outside of the kinds of stuff they have been doing to meddle in our elections for the last 100 years.

The thought that these “Russians” would favor the election of Donald Trump over the eternally grifting Hillary Clinton in 2016 wasn’t absurd enough for these people. Now, we are supposed to believe that they are helping Trump to defeat an out-and-out communist ideologue.

Think about it: Vladimir Putin, more than anyone else on the face of the earth, fully understands the society-destroying impacts of socialist/communist ideology. He lived it. Putin – if our corrupt intelligence agencies are to be believed – wants to destroy and dominate the U.S. and other Western democracies. What better way to achieve that than by helping a freaking communist get elected President of the United States? The whole charade here is an absolute farce.

The opening paragraph of the piece is greatest part of it:

Intelligence officials warned House lawmakers last week that Russia was interfering in the 2020 campaign to try to get President Trump re-elected, five people familiar with the matter said, a disclosure to Congress that angered Mr. Trump, who complained that Democrats would use it against him.

Note the reference to “five people familiar with the matter”, none of whom are of course identified. Did the Times really talk to “five people” who had first-hand knowledge of this briefing? There is no way to know. But saying “five people” rather than “a person” is the Times way of trying to give the piece more credibility.

Then there’s my favorite part, the one about how the “disclosure to Congress that angered Mr. Trump, who complained that Democrats would use it against him.”

Um, doesn’t the very existence of this report in the New York Times clearly demonstrate that the President was right? Didn’t he have every right to be angered that Maguire, a freaking temp in his job, chose to spread this crap as a parting gift to the Administration as he prances out the door, no doubt about to get a big book deal or a contract as a contributor on CNN or MSNBC?

Now, do you understand why the President is intent on putting someone he can actually trust  into the DNI position? What Maguire – and his aide Shelby Pierson, whom the Times claims delivered the report to the members of congress – did is an outright betrayal, an outrage that should be punished by their immediate firings.

But the damage is done, and the Democrat/media narrative is set: Bereft of any other viable alternatives or viable presidential candidates to really challenge President Trump, the Axis of Disinformation goes back to pushing the Russia Collusion BS one more time. They will now poll-test and focus group public reactions to the new narrative, and if they think it has any legs, they will continue to pound it day after day right up until November 3. Because this is what these people do, and this is who they are.

Yes, it’s despicable. Yes, it’s depraved. Yes, it’s disgusting and demented and disloyal to our nation and destructive to our Republic. But, really, after the last four years, did you expect anything else?

That is all.

Today’s news moves at a faster pace than ever. Whatfinger.com is my go-to source for keeping up with all the latest events in real time.

12 thoughts on “Dems Have a Terrible Debate, So We’re Back to Russia Collusion One More Time

  1. phineas gage - February 21, 2020

    Just what i was thinking driving in this morning listening to this nonsense on the news. Pure distraction, anything to change the subject from the Dem disaster and to derail the Grenell’s nomination. Presto, the NYT pulls out one of its pre-packaged hit jobs, and the rest of the media just falls in line.

    The Deep State and their media chums really are desperate at this point, because this particularl lie has lost all of its mythical power, considering the past three years. As you memorably wrote not so long ago, ‘that cat won’t flush’. The media will keep trying to jam it down anyways. The law of asymptotic diminishing returns begins to apply.

  2. Jimmy MacAfee - February 21, 2020

    Russia, like China, doesn’t want the US to be a world power, economically nor militarily. Why would they want someone who is restoring America in both? Trump is their worst nightmare!

    The Dems are determinedly destroying America, which is why the Chinese (and Russians) prefer Bern-brains, Hillary Rotten Clinton, Mindless Joe, PeterButt, Lieawatha and China Bee, AKA Mini Mike. As they demolish America, so they reason, their fortunes increase.

    Most Americans know who the enemy is: those people trying to reduce us to nothing. While the Russians and Chinese are happy to help the process, the facilitators are nearly all on the Dem side. (Or should I say the Dim side?)

    When this is all out in the open, there will be a major shift – a landslide of sorts – as the press, the Deep State, the Dims and their other accomplices are exposed.

    1. phineas gage - February 21, 2020
  3. Jimmy MacAfee - February 21, 2020

    Berman the bird-brain judge in the Roger Stone case also went full-moron with another Russian narrative. She’s not just venal and evil, but stupid, too.

    1. phineas gage - February 21, 2020

      She needs to be impeached and removed from the bench.

      In the meantime, Roberts needs to administer some discipline.

  4. Gregg - February 21, 2020

    Speculation by Beck recently and some TN radio personalities today are worried that Bernie, the outright Commie, will get the nomination and they fear he might actually win – spelling the end of the country as we know it.

    News Flash: If any Dem wins any presidential election, we are through as a free constitutional republic – we can’t survive another Obama, and he would now be considered a “moderate”. The only difference between Bernie and the others is that Bernie is actually open and honest about his platform for the most part. While the others might not be as “extreme” – meaning they would be malleable figureheads for the Deep State puppet-masters – they would be just as damaging to our republic and get their destructive policies enacted.

    We can’t settle for, or elect, a less extreme “moderate”. I want the biggest distinction between Trump and the Dem nominee possible, and Bernie fits that roll.

    People who are called “moderates” today would have been considered unelectable wackos as recently as 2008.

    Furthermore, no matter which Republican won the nomination in 2016, there would have been a similar coup against him to defeat him in the election to grease the skids for Hillary. And if he actually beat Hillary like Trump did, there would have been a similar “impeachment” conspiracy and removal effort against a president Cruz, Kasich, Rubio, or Jeb, and it would have been a Nixonian success. Trump is the only one would have successfully prevailed because he has big salt and pepper shakers and is utterly unafraid.

    Personally I want Bernie to win the nomination and be so thoroughly trashed by Trump that the communist/Dem anti-America platform is destroyed as a political movement for the foreseeable future. Trump didn’t win by being half-hearted in 2016. In this life and death political battle, we must be all in and defeat the most radical of our ideological enemies. It really is an all or nothing situation.

    The philosophy of “moderation” being the best policy has been a proven fallacy with the elections of the Bushes and the nomination of the designated loser GOP moderates since Ford; there are no books written celebrating the “Great Moderates in History”. The bigger the risk the greater the reward, is the only way to go.

    This time Trump is not a risk, but a proven pro-America commodity. The bogus portrayal of Trump being an “extremist” is the same old tripe (propaganda) that has been said about every Republican at almost every level for at least the last fifty years. Amazing how people like Romney and McLame are supported by the MSM when they are in the primaries, then they become “extreme” after they steal the GOP nomination.

    1. Boarwild - February 22, 2020

      Spot on Gregg!!! Every word!!! A thousand upvotes!!! Only thing to add is that ever since Thomas Dewey (“Dewey Defeats Truman”) EVERY GOP nominee has been the latest incantation of Adolf Hitler.

  5. D3F1ANT - February 21, 2020

    Russia Russia Russia! And, once again, Americans collectively roll our eyes…

  6. brian - February 21, 2020

    My eight near reliable sources in CSIS here in Canukdom are confirming that indeed Russia is helping Trump to win the upcoming election. They, the Russians, are sending bots and the Russian womens wrestling team to manage and control the outcome. They are actively working hard to ensure the comrade Bernie doesn’t steal the election. Dwayne Dibbley, Vanouver Times.

Comments are closed.

Scroll to top
%d bloggers like this: