Today’s Campaign Update, Part II (Because the Campaign Never Ends)
Corrupt Chuck Todd is fast becoming the most tiresomely predictable man in the fake news media. – Whenever the DNC needs a narrative to be pushed, there is no more reliable direction to which it can turn than directly to NBC’s Chuck Todd. If there are Democrat talking points to be recited, no one recites them more fluently, agitatedly, or as verbatim than Corrupt Chuck.
Pretending to “host” his daily show on MSNBC, Todd actually parroted the following DNC talking points about the clear new front-runner in the run for the Democrat presidential nomination:
“I don’t understand how Bernie is considered a front-runner,” an animated Todd said on “Meet the Press Daily” on MSNBC. “This is a guy that, more people showed up to the polls, highest turnout ever, and his percentage went down, not up. His total number went down, not up.”
“I feel like the only people who are going out on a limb and calling Bernie Sanders the front-runner, they have other reasons to call him front-runner,” Todd, who moderates “Meet the Press” and serves as political director for NBC News, argued.
Yes, folks, Corrupt Chuck really has a hard time understanding why anyone would call the guy who has won the most votes in the first two contests of the nominating season, who now leads in all of the national public opinion polls, and who now strongly leads the polls in the next contest in Nevada, a front-runner.
You seriously could never make this stuff up.
Predictably, Todd attempted to bolster his ludicrous talking-points parroting by parroting more DNC talking points, to wit:
“This is a guy that, more people showed up to the polls, highest turnout ever, and his percentage went down, not up. His total number went down, not up.”
“One person leads delegates, one person has a lock on a chunk of the party, but we don’t know where this goes.”
Yes, Preacher Pete Buttigieg does currently enjoy a one-delegate edge over The Commie. But that is purely a result of the efforts by the DNC to rig the process against Sanders. How else do we explain the awarding of one more delegate in Iowa to Buttigieg, who received 6,000 fewer votes than Sanders in the first round of caucusing and almost 3,000 fewer in the second round? How else do we explain the awarding of the same number of delegates to both men in New Hampshire after Sanders won over 4,000 more votes than Preacher Pete did?
And yes, The Commie’s total vote number in New Hampshire did go down from what he received in 2016. But only a rank simpleton or a dishonest DNC hack like Todd would stop his analysis there. In 2016, Sanders faced only 2 competitors, and only one who actually mattered: The Pantsuit Princess. This year, he faced 9 competitors in the Democrat field. Given that many of the votes he received in 2016 were inevitably protest votes against the Fainting Felon, it was inevitable that Sanders would get more votes this year.
Thus, Todd’s “analysis” is as idiotic as it is dishonest.
The real question about Todd’s rationalization is how does anyone holding himself out to be an honest journalist go on-air and endorse the DNC’s blatantly corrupt process?
Well, we all know the answer to that, don’t we? Corrupt Chuck is nothing more than a Democrat activist posing as a “newsman.” That is all he has ever been, and all he will ever be.
That is all.
Today’s news moves at a faster pace than ever. Whatfinger.com is my go-to source for keeping up with all the latest events in real time.