Democrats Disgrace Themselves in Response to the Killing of Soleimani

Today’s Campaign Update, Part II
(Because The Campaign Never Ends)

Poor Chuck Schumer has the sads that he was not informed in advance of the U.S. military drone strike that took out Iranian terrorist leader Qassem Soleimani. – Well, tough. Obviously, neither Schumer, nor Nancy Pelosi nor any other Democrat could be informed in advance for the very same that Soleimani himself wasn’t told: Because they cannot be trusted to support U.S. interests anywhere in the world.

It really has come to this. If an action is taken by President Donald Trump, Democrats automatically knee-jerk to the position that it is inherently bad and coordinate with their corrupt media toadies to try to undermine it. Barack Hussein Obama – to his credit – took out hundreds of terrorists with drone strikes during his 8 years in office. During all that time, neither Schumer nor San Fran Nan nor any other leading Democrat uttered a peep of protest about the unconstitutional War Powers Act or indeed, any criticism of their dear leader.

But here’s Pelosi’s reaction today to President Trump’s authorized strike on the leading planner of Islamic terror on the face of the earth:

“The full Congress must be immediately briefed on this serious situation and on the next steps under consideration by the Administration, including the significant escalation of the deployment of additional troops to the region,” Pelosi said.

Here’s New Mexico Senator Tom Udall:

Senator Tom Udall, the author of a bipartisan amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act to prevent war with Iran without the consent of Congress, said in a statement that Mr. Trump “is bringing our nation to the brink of an illegal war with Iran without any congressional approval as required under the Constitution of the United States.”

“Such a reckless escalation of hostilities is likely a violation of Congress’ war making authority – as well as our basing agreement with Iraq – putting U.S. forces and citizens in danger and very possibly sinking us into another disastrous war in the Middle East that the American people are not asking for and do not support,” Udall said. “Congress must step in immediately to reclaim its Constitutional war powers.”

Where were they when Obama was ordering dozens of similar strikes on Iranian and ISIS and Al Qaeda targets from 2009 through 2016? Not a peep.

But it gets even better.

Watch Democrat Congressman Chris Murphy, who was briefly a candidate for the Democrat presidential nomination in 2019, do a complete 180 on the Trump response to Iran in a mere 48 hours. Here is what he tweeted after the Iran-led storming of the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad:

Image

And here is what he said this morning, after the President took his decisive action:

Image

You just cannot make these raging hypocrites up.

For the record, no president – whether a Democrat or Republican – is required to seek congressional authorization for these limited military engagements. Nothing President Trump did this week violated any federal law or constitutional provision in any way, shape or form. These disloyal, seditious Democrats are angry this morning because they were not given an advance notice so that they could attempt to deny Trump a “win” by leaking the information to their toadies at the New York Times or CNN.

This is the clear reality our nation faces today: One of our major political parties no longer maintains any loyalty to our country’s clear interests and well-being.

So, of course no Democrat leader was given advance notice of the drone strike that took out one of the most vicious leaders of Islamic terrorism on earth. Because they could not be trusted. It really is that simple.

That is all.

 

Today’s news moves at a faster pace than ever. Whatfinger.com is my go-to source for keeping up with all the latest events in real time.

22 thoughts on “Democrats Disgrace Themselves in Response to the Killing of Soleimani

  1. Jer - January 3, 2020

    And no democrat should have a security clearance for that very same reason.

  2. morrisangelo - January 3, 2020

    Tell a Democrat the plan and it will be on the national news within 15 minutes.

  3. Jimmy MacAfee - January 3, 2020

    “We came; we saw: he died!” followed by an evil, sadistic cackle. That was Hillary Rodham Clinton, regarding her illegal war against Libya, and the rape/murder of Ghaddafi in the street. Sick. She thought that she’d ride that war pony all the way to the Whitehouse. (Nancy? Chuckles? I’ve heard chicks peep louder.)

    Chuckles has a reflex: whatever the President does, he’s against. Either, way, his numbers are off: his age is too large or his IQ is shrinking too fast. Or both.

    I remember when the false sarin gas attack occurred in 2013. It was a false flag event, and “victims” were staged with shaving cream (note to fakers: bubbles exuding from the mouth of the dead and dying are generally not uniform like Kool Whip.) This was one time I supported President Obama: it was clearly a setup to get rid of Assad and bring in the same people who murdered, raped and enslaved thousands of Syrian Christians – the same people No Name broke bread with and called “allies.” The bodies, by the way, were seen being dealt with using ordinary masks, gloves and gowns, not the required HAZMAT suits. Same people did the “sarin” ummm, no, “chlorine,” dropped from, umm, no, placed in cannisters on the ground non-attacks that got President Trump to send in a couple of cruise missiles. It was proportionate. It also sent a signal to others in the Far East.

    The Iranian people are tired of being dominated by the Insanians. We stand in solidarity with them, and with anyone sick of Insanian terrorism. The Iranian people deserve better, but it is up to them to throw off the chains. May they have much success! I vote we help them in strategic ways, but not get involved in nation-building.

    Chuckles and Nancy can go pound sand.

  4. Jimmy MacAfee - January 3, 2020

    Dems politicized Intelligence (and Law Enforcement) (and every other department.)

    So Chuckles, tell me again why the President would tell Adam S. and Mark Warner anything about processes that could be disrupted by leaks? You’ve politicized Intelligence, to a level never before seen in the United States of America. Both claimed to have credible information about Trump and the Russians, and neither produced any evidence whatsoever. These dopes cannot be trusted.

    Can’t wait until the day – (coming soon!) – when the NSC is cut in half, and when Adam S is no longer in Congress.

  5. phineas gage - January 3, 2020

    Chris Murphy is likely receiving campaign cash from the Iranian regime, and is not the only one.

    Even the Dems operating on ideology alone have become completely unhinged. In particular, the responses from former Obama stooges like Rhodes and Vietor are revealing.

    You would think that at least a few of the Democrat candidates would show some restraint for political reasons, but they have not. Apparently the rationale is that they must appease the radical fringe that now comprises the majority of their base.

    1. Jimmy MacAfee - January 3, 2020

      Not just Murphy!

      Chinese-cash to NY Times; Qatar-cash to the WaPo – (those aren’t exclusives, and financial “backing” can come from others.) Just like China’s words and China-Boy Bloomberg have the same talking points re. gun control. The CIA’s Mockingbird is also paying a lot of salaries, for stories that are nebulous at best. No wonder Trump tweets!

      So much of our landscape has been bought by people who intend nothing good for our Nation; I don’t mind foreign investment – (to a limit) – but our press appears to be compromised with laundered money on a very large scale. And the State Department seems to be one big money laundering scheme as well.

  6. phineas gage - January 3, 2020

    Don’t forget the Washington Post and their ‘most revered leader’……

  7. phineas gage - January 3, 2020

    Markets down and oil up, but I would bet things will settle down before the end of the day.

  8. Jimmy MacAfee - January 3, 2020

    There have been reports lately – (common sources, not classified) – which suggest some potential larger events that Iran had been planning. Best to remove the author of these plans before the plans could be put into operation.

    Think: container ships. EMP. Things worse than you can imagine. Speculation, probably not what was acted on. But Iran has the desire to make bad things bigger.

    1. phineas gage - January 3, 2020

      Yes, the few details indicate that there was operative intelligence about just why Suleimani was in Baghdad, and it wasn’t just to rile up a few terrorist scrubs. An overthrow of the Iraqi government was evidently in the offing.

      1. phineas gage - January 3, 2020

        And I’d be willing to bet much of that intelligence came from Israel.

        1. Jimmy MacAfee - January 4, 2020

          Likely multiple sources, including Israel. President Trump is skeptical, as he should be, of Intelligence: this means that his information is solid and verifiable. You don’t see too many people crying “FF.”

  9. Jimmy MacAfee - January 3, 2020

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/expert-iran-ships-a-dry-run-for-later-nuclear-emp-attack-humiliate-obama
    Remember, this was 2014:

    2014
    “Iran’s surprising decision to move warships off the Atlantic coast poses a potential catastrophic threat to America from a nuclear or electromagnetic pulse attack, according to an expert who foresaw Iran’s move.

    Peter Pry, an expert on EMP attacks, said the ships are likely a dry run for a future attack, a maneuver meant to lull Washington into complacency while also embarrassing President Obama and his effort to convince Tehran to give up production of a nuclear bomb in return for a lifting of some economic sanctions.
    “Yes, patrols by the Iranian Navy off our coasts could pose threat of a surprise EMP attack,” said Pry, who with others such as former CIA Director R. James Woolsey, has convinced several state legislatures to take moves to harden their electric and energy grids from EMP attack because Washington won’t.”

    Old news, but still relevant.

    Now:
    They (Iran) expected something to happen when they tried to destroy our embassy; they expected something different than what happened – such as a blockade or a skirmish with their navy. Their air force is in tatters, but they have missiles and they have a navy, and they have sleepers. But now, they don’t have their main strategian,. and it is likely that his pre-death orders are known. Intel does have a purpose.

    Suck it, Iran. And your little doggie, too (Kerry.)

    1. Jonesy - January 3, 2020

      The dry run for an EMP attack you mention above has been discussed for quite some time; its been forewarned as critical gap in our defense since at least 2004. An EMP attack on America has to be one of the worst case scenarios, hands down. I hope our defense agencies are keeping an eye out for this – a high altitude detonation over the central US not withstanding, even a grid failure for the west coast, east coast, or southern US would cripple us for quite a while, tank markets, cause widespread panic and cause quite a few deaths. Maybe Iran didn’t have the capability 10-15 years ago, but I suspect they do now.

      Prepare now.

      As for Dems, they are a disgrace as usual.

      1. Jimmy MacAfee - January 3, 2020

        https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2019/03/29/trump-signs-executive-order-to-prepare-for-emp-attack/
        “President Donald Trump issued an executive order on Tuesday directing the federal government to prepare a coordinated response plan in the event of an electromagnetic pulse attack (EMP). The order described the enormous damage such an attack could cause and noted the U.S. government currently lacks a coherent plan of action for responding to one.”

        As is often the case, the President is doing what no one else has been willing to do.

  10. Vetmike - January 3, 2020

    Hard to imagine the Democrats acting more disgraceful than they are already, but, what the heck, one should always aim to do better than the time before.

  11. phineas gage - January 3, 2020

    The eyes in that picture are crazy–Nancy’s got the exopthalmos, and I don’t know what is going on with Chuck, it looks like Bell’s palsy or a mild stroke.

    1. Jimmy MacAfee - January 3, 2020

      Chuckles: TIA, more than likely.

  12. phineas gage - January 3, 2020

    Geraldo Rivera has applied gasoline and a flaming torch to what was left of his career, which wasn’t much.

    No great loss.

  13. Gregg - January 3, 2020

    Forty years ago, Jimmy Peanut made the decision to allow Iran to be taken over and dominated by radical lunatics – Trump is heavily sanctioning them into economic collapse and which will hopefully foment a revolt from within to end their national lunacy.

    Forty years latter, Peanut’s Democratic Party made the decision to be taken over and dominated by radical lunatics – Trump is showing the whole country their agenda, creating their economic collapse, which will hopefully foment a revolt from within (the party if there are any decent Democrats still around to lead it) to end their anti-American lunacy.

    “Democrats Disgrace Themselves”

    At this point, I would be disappointed if the Democrats did not “disgrace themselves” – it’s what they do and who they are.

  14. Jimmy MacAfee - January 3, 2020

    I think the title should be: “Democrats Soil Themselves.”

    Nan looks like she’s got a good load in tow, and Chuckles looks like he’s working on one.

  15. foods651 - January 3, 2020

    Guttersnipes cannot be disgraced.

Comments are closed.

Scroll to top
%d bloggers like this: