Would You Trust Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi With Your Life?

Today’s Campaign Update, Part II
(Because The Campaign Never Ends)

During his press conference Sunday morning following his announcement of the U.S. military operation to take out ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, President Trump said some congressional leaders were pre-briefed on the operation but not others:

“We notified some; others are being notified as I speak,” Trump said.

“We were going to notify them last night but we decided not to do that because Washington leaks like I’ve never seen before,” Trump said. “There is no country in the world that leaks like we do and Washington is a leaking machine.”

Trump said that U.S. forces would have been placed in greater danger due to leaks in Washington tipping off the terrorists.

“A leak could have caused the death of all of them,” Trump said.

It has now been confirmed that, among those who the White House and Pentagon chose not to brief were San Fran Nan and Bug-Eyed Adam Schiff. The Democrat toady news media and Twitter Perpetual Outrage Mob are naturally going berserk over this revelation, but the truth is that it is completely justified, and very likely prevented news of the operation being leaked to the New York Times and CNN in advance.

Either of those media outlets has proved time after time that they would have no hesitation whatsoever to putting U.S. military lives in jeopardy if it meant scoring political points for their Democrat masters. Does anyone outside of the Democrat/media axis propaganda really think either Pelosi or Schiff could be trusted to hold this information secret?

Not a chance in the world, if they decided that leaking it was to their political advantage. So the President and his advisors were right to refuse to brief these seditious opponents in advance, for the sake of keeping the military personnel involved safe. Russian leader Vladimir Putin and leaders of the Syrian government could be trusted to hold the information confidential, but not the Democrat leaders in the United States congress.

This is a sad reality, but it is the reality in which the Democrats and their media toadies are forcing us all to live.

That is all.

 

Today’s news moves at a faster pace than ever. Whatfinger.com is my go-to source for keeping up with all the latest events in real time.

8 thoughts on “Would You Trust Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi With Your Life?

  1. M Allen - October 27, 2019

    I woundn’t trust them to bring me a glass of water. Those two and the rest of the far left dems are far more dangerous to our country than ISIS is.

  2. Buzz - October 27, 2019

    Trust Nasty Pelosi with my life? Just look at how many American citizens have lost their lives at the hands of some illegal alien invader because Nasty Pelosi and the rest of the democRATic ilk oppose enforcing our border by building a wall that would keep some of the illegal alien criminal slime out of the country. Not on my life would I trust Nasty Pelosi with my life.

  3. Bob S - October 27, 2019

    I would not trust them with one thin dime!!

  4. Gregg - October 27, 2019

    Was Schmuckie Schumer and the other Dem senate t*rds briefed?

    I would not trust ANY democrat with ANYTHING!

  5. caffeineator - October 27, 2019

    I don’t tryst them with YOUR life much less my own.

  6. alonzo1956 - October 27, 2019

    ” Russian leader Vladimir Putin and leaders of the Syrian government could be trusted to hold the information confidential, but not the Democrat leaders in the United States congress.”

    That is a STARK reality David.

  7. Jimmy MacAfee - October 27, 2019

    You can see the WaPo headline, which at one time read: “Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, austere religious scholar at helm of Islamic State, dies at 48.” That was the second edition, which then reverted back to the 1st (which called al-Baghdadi the “Islamic State’s terrorist in chief.”) I wonder if Obumbler (or al-Bumbler) wrote the section calling him an “austere religious scholar?” Or was it John Brennan?

    Since there isn’t a sliver of difference between Obumbler and Pelosi, and since John Kerry admitted that ISIS was being used in order to get Assad to leave Syria, and since Barack al-Bumbler was a silent partner of ISIS, it wouldn’t make sense to let Princess Pelosi know anything about the mission. Besides, the witch-hunters would gladly sacrifice our SO if they could make Trump eat the disaster.

    Good job, Mr. President – and to all those who carried out and planned the mission and made it work. It was nice to see the President give credit to everyone concerned (including the IC) and not beat his own chest like al-Bumbler did with UBL. A victory for the good guys. And shame on the WaPo and the Princess and much of mainstream media. Even Adam Schiff had enough sense to praise the mission.

  8. guidvce4 - October 28, 2019

    To answer the question asked, NOPE! I wouldn’t trust any dem/leftists/commie with my back, front or any other part of my life. The TDS affected leftists have no honor left in their beings. They have proven this over the course of the last 3 years, so many times that its hard to keep count.
    I keep thinking of how different this nation would be today if the midterms had not been stolen by the leftists in ’18. Or, the repugs in congress and senate would back President Donald J. Trump fully. I think they have come to the realizaton that PDJT is far ahead of them with each action he takes in straightening up the mess left behind by the previous administration.
    KAG 2020.

Comments are closed.

Scroll to top
%d bloggers like this: