Advertisements

The Biden Agonistes are Just Beginning

Today’s Campaign Update
(Because The Campaign Never Ends)

Creepy Uncle Joe steps in it again. – Joe Biden’s status as the Unfrozen Caveman Senator in the Democrat presidential race took another ugly turn this week when, in a Tuesday fundraising speech in New York, Biden praised former segregationist Democrat senators he served with waaaaayyyyyy back in the ’70s like Herman Talmage and James Eastland. This naturally set off a round of shameless virtue-signaling from his white opponents and fits of moral outrage from his black opponents – Cory Booker and Kamala Harris – who have made a career of trading on identity politics.

So, what did the nation’s Creepy Uncle say that was so offensive? Here’s how the fake reporters at the AP characterize it in their piece this morning:

The controversy began at a New York fundraiser Tuesday when Biden pointed to long-dead segregationist senators James Eastland of Mississippi and Herman Talmadge of Georgia to argue that Washington functioned more smoothly a generation ago than under today’s “broken” hyperpartisanship.

“We didn’t agree on much of anything,” Biden said of the two men, who were prominent senators when Biden was elected in 1972. Biden described Talmadge as “one of the meanest guys I ever knew” and said Eastland called him “son,” though not “boy,” a reference to the racist way many whites addressed black men at the time.

Booker, Harris and all their white companions desperate to grab a share of the “black vote”, as the Democrats love to call it, rushed to condemn Biden for praising segregationists for being “civil.” But of course, the trouble with that criticism is that that part of what Biden said was actually true – the U.S. Senate of the ’70s did exhibit a remarkable level of bipartisanship and civility in addressing issues, especially when compared with the hyperpartisan crap show we see in the “world’s greatest deliberative body” today.

But if Biden’s virtue-signaling, moral outrage-expressing opponents had a lick of sense and honesty – which we know they don’t since they’re all Democrats – they’d attack him for the blatant, outright lie that truly stands out in those two AP paragraphs, which is his statement that “We didn’t agree on much of anything.”

My goodness. That took some nerve.

What was the litmus test on de-segregation when Biden took office in the senate back in 1973? Forced busing. Along with all the old Democrat segregationists in the senate at that time, like Talmadge, Eastland, Howell Heflin, Ernest Hollings, Sam Ervin and Robert Byrd, who was one of the loudest, most aggressive opponents of forced busing? If you said Joe Biden, you would be correct.

See, schools in the northeast during those years were every bit as segregated as those in the southern states. Indeed, Biden made his fierce opposition to forced busing a centerpiece of his initial campaign for the senate. It is fair to credit that position on that key issue largely for his election to the senate in the first place.

Then there was Biden’s ardent opposition to that other litmus test for helping the nation’s African American population at that time, racial quotas in hiring and school admissions, which proponents like to call “Affirmative Action.” Like his southern senate colleagues, Good ol’ Joe was dead set against those as well.

Don’t believe me? Here is what he told a Delaware reporter in 1975:

I do not buy the concept, popular in the ‘60s, which said, ‘We have suppressed the black man for 300 years and the white man is now far ahead in the race for everything our society offers. In order to even the score, we must now give the black man a head start, or even hold the white man back, to even the race.’ I don’t buy that. I don’t feel responsible for the sins of my father and grandfather. I feel responsible for what the situation is today, for the sins of my own generation. And I’ll be damned if I feel responsible to pay for what happened 300 years ago.”

Interesting quotes, huh? Especially interesting in light of yesterday’s shameful Democrat-staged hearing in the House on reparations.

Here’s the truth about Joe Biden: He agreed with the ’70s-era southern Democrat segregationists about pretty much everything, and wasn’t real shy about saying so at the time. Of course, everyone’s political views change over time, and Biden is no doubt no exception.

But this long record of publicly spouting off and all those thousands of votes he took over 36 years in the Senate are, as I keep trying tell everyone, a very big and real problem for Biden, and a big reason why he ultimately will not be the party’s nominee in 2020. It will be a long, slow death by 1,000 cuts. There are literally dozens more really bad days still to come for Biden, days when the media and his opponents will hit him with all the stupid stuff he said back in the ’70s, ’80s, ’90s and ’00s.

Even the ’10s, come to think of it, because saying stupid stuff has always been Joe Biden’s real stock in trade, and in that, he has definitely not evolved.

That is all.

Follow me on Twitter at @GDBlackmon

Today’s news moves at a faster pace than ever. Whatfinger.com is my go-to source for keeping up with all the latest events in real time.

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “The Biden Agonistes are Just Beginning

  1. Jimmy MacAfee - June 20, 2019

    “President Baxter Harris.” Scary Movie 3 and 4.
    Perfect illustration – if you’ve ever seen the movies.
    If you have, you should be laughing.

    New nickname for Joe? Baxter.

  2. Gregg - June 20, 2019

    Archie Edith Bunker should be the new name for Joseph Robinette Biden.

    Biden and All In the Family became prominent in the 1970s and Biden is every bit as racist as Archie and just as stupid as Edith.

    Soon Creepy Uncle Joe will be running to his “Bunker” to avoid the real scrutiny that is coming, especially when his radical Dem opponents and AG Barr expose the corrupt deals he (and by extension, Obama) made with China for his son during his time as VP under the corrupt Obama Administration.

    I was always curious as to why Obama chose Biden; I believe he was an empty suit inserted just to balance the ticket to make it appear and appeal to the more moderate wing of the Dem. Party.

    The very fact that he did not (logically) run in 2016 was because the powers-that-be told him not to run against Hillary because it was “her turn” and they had already denounced their roots: the white male working middle class.

    1. Jimmy MacAfee - June 20, 2019

      HRC knew where the bodies were/are buried; you don’t think she told Baxter that she knew what his son was up to in Ukraine and China? That she’d use it against him in the nomination? While she thought it was “her turn,” and so did others, HRC HAD to know what Baxter’s son was doing. (Lurch’s son, too?)

  3. Don McCoy - June 20, 2019

    If we just toss them a lighter, the Dems will fire-up their own exploding cigar!

  4. Howie - June 20, 2019

    Old Joe has tertiary dementia.

  5. Buzz - June 20, 2019

    Watch Groping Joe fondling a very young girl as she attempts to pull away. And the DemocRATs want to put this old pedophile in the WH. Pass it on, everyone needs to see just what this creep is.

  6. […] “Meat on the hoof?” I knew that you could! […]

Comments are closed.

Scroll to top
%d bloggers like this: