We Can’t Put Democrat Judges in Charge of Enforcing Red Flag Laws

Today’s Campaign Update
(Because The Campaign Never Ends)

Oh, noes, not Stacey!!!! – Because I know all you readers have been sitting around fretting, wondering when, oh, when will the stellar, awesome, brilliant, and indeed heroic Stacey Abrams jump into this race for the Democrat Party’s presidential nomination, I am oh, so sad to report the following news: She ain’t running.

Yesterday, the insufferable loooooooooser from Georgia, in whom Democrat Party leaders invested gobs of time, energy and money, trying desperately to build her into a national thing, announced that, after long contemplation of whether or not she wanted to get into another race she would be bound to lose, she did what fellow looooooooooser Irish Bob O’Rourke didn’t have the sense to do and decided to go do something else she might actually be good at doing. (Yeah, I know that was a run-on sentence, but I sure had fun writing it.)

Instead, Ms. Abrams has decided to apply her boundless energy for whining to the endeavor she loves most: Encouraging voter fraud. Oh, yeah, I know she actually said that she’s going to lead some organization whose goal is to fight “voter suppression,” but that’s just Democrat code for making sure all the dead and illegal aliens get to vote, too.

“My job is to be the voice to those who do not believe they are heard,” Abrams told a chanting audience. Dead people do have a hard time being heard, that’s for sure.

Hey, maybe she can get Irish Bob to help her run this enterprise, but not until after he has dropped out of the presidential race, come back to Texas and lost another race for the senate against John Cornyn. Which is pretty much an inevitability at this point, now that the editorial board at the Houston Chronicle, one of his major cheerleading squads during his failed attempt to unseat Ted Cruz, has set the stage for that to happen.

These Democrats are so darn transparent once you understand how they really think.

Ok, so Chris Cuomo can’t have guns, then? – Quote yesterday from President Donald Trump: “There’s nobody more pro-Second Amendment than Donald Trump, but I don’t want guns in the hands of a lunatic or manic.”

That gets me to this proposal running around for congress to pass a “red flag law” in the wake of the mass shootings in El Paso and Dayton. All you need to know about how a red flag law would work is this sub-head from an August 6 article published about them in the Democrat Party propaganda sheet New York Times:

“Hoping to prevent more mass shootings, some states have tried empowering courts to take guns away from potentially dangerous people.”

The emphasis added there is mine, because that’s the salient point here that tells anyone whose political views are to the right of Ho Chi Minh that we simply cannot and must not have a national red flag law in the United States of America in the post- Barack Obama world. Anyone who has been paying even a modicum of attention to what has been taking place in our courts over the last 3 years knows that Obama packed the federal judiciary with hundreds of Manchurian Candidate judges who are willing to issue any decision, no matter how contrary it might be to the constitution, that will advance the leftist cause in our country.

We have had so many examples of Obama judges issuing bald-faced fraudulent decisions and getting smacked down by the Supreme Court in recent years that they are almost not even newsworthy anymore, which was exactly the plan to begin with. Leaving the determination of which citizens might be a danger to others should they obtain a firearm up to these particular judges is simply a recipe for willy-nilly gun confiscation anytime some leftwing activist group wants them confiscated. We’d ultimately end up in a situation in which you could have your guns taken away if you get suspended on Facebook or post a Tweet that some pimple-faced slob out in Silicon Valley working as a Twitter monitor finds objectionable.

Some of you might still, after all this time and all of these anti-Constitutional judicial decisions think I’m being ridiculous, and that’s fine. But take a look at the campaign the Democrats and their media toadies have been pushing since those latest mass shootings, which is to convince the American public not only that the President of the United States is a “white supremacist” – and thus, a danger to society – but anyone who supports him is also a “white supremacist.”

This is not me being an alarmist – this is all utterly transparent and predictable.

The other thing to remember is that, sooner or later, the Democrats are going to elect another president of their own, and that someone will look and sound a lot like one of those nutcases you have seen on your TV screen for the last six months. Do you really want to put a federal law on the books that would allow one of those lunatics and the fellow lunatics they would appoint to have discretion over who should and should not be able to arm and defend themselves in this society?

Sorry, no. Hard, hard pass.

That is all.


Today’s news moves at a faster pace than ever. Whatfinger.com is my go-to source for keeping up with all the latest events in real time.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jimmy MacAfee

An aside:

AOC doesn’t know what a garbage disposal is or why they exist.

Marilyn Crawford

This is not about anything other than the FACT that the dems continue to be the sorest losers on the planet. They are the nastiest and slimiest filth I have ever seen in my 65 years. They should never represent anything except maybe Satan, oh, they do.


Everyone here has it right – red flag laws will be the tool they use to take our 2A rights. As DB noted, the are a lot of leftist judges already in the system. In principle, if you got a court hearing before you lost your rights, i.e. due process, it could maybe work if you had a true unbiased judicial system. Count on the left to stack every court they can find. Libs have reprogrammed speech and when they and the media control the narrative of what is “bad” speech, anything conservatives say will be construed as dangerous.


Reminds me of the Patriot Act. I thought, ok, G.W., I sort of trust you, but what happens if/when we again get someone like Klintoon in the White House? We couldn’t trust such a person to not use the Act against us. THEN, we got one who was much, much worse than Slick Willie, and ended up with the big “collusion” fiasco!

A Red Flag law, if not properly implemented, will end up negatively effecting many more people than the Patriot Act has done.

John Jerome Pyskaty

Red Flag !aws mean never being able to defend yourself and they may put you away at the same time as your guns. I have had to use the “danger to themselves and others” on both my Mother and Aunt. My Mom had a cerebral hemorrhage, talked only nonsense, and forgot she needed a walker. My Aunt had Alzheimer’s and kept attacking my Uncle who after 50 years marriage could not recognize. They both went away kicking and screaming and had no way to appeal since no judge was involved.
They were a danger to themselves. This is not a power you want giving to the dems. They all believe we are a danger and should be exterminated or locked. Please President Trump don’t go near this.

Jimmy MacAfee

Alert: Tulsi Gabbard needs to be sequestered from war zones: scheduled by DS to be Epsteined.

A Mongoose

The same people who report you and get you banned on FB, Twitter when you “offend them” will be the ones calling in anonymous tips to have your guns seized.

Jimmy MacAfee

Right: don’t use the proper gender pronoun, and you lose your rights.

Jimmy MacAfee

The SPLC will be in charge of determining who should be red-flagged, too. And Snopes.

Jimmy MacAfee

I forgot to add: YouTube: banned from YouTube means a red flag and no right to defend yourself? Hmmm.

In nearly every case of mass murder in recent years, the FBI was warned – and they did nothing. Even 9/11, when GOOD, competent FBI agents warned about the hijackers, the top brass did nothing. Nada. Zilch. And then Mueller suppressed these GOOD agents and kept them from testifying.

Same with most all of the mass murderers: the FBI found nothing of interest. And with the cowards of Broward County facilitating the mass murder.

Also a link: most of the murderers were Incels: involuntary celibates. Losers. And many were on tricyclic antidepressants. (Some, not all; some unknown.) But the main link to most of the mass murderers was/is that the FBI and the fact that they knew. Of course, the FBI has radicalization programs, like PATCON, in which they stimulate a murderer to make an attack, and then sometimes catch him before he can kill. (Sometimes.) Other times, they seem to put out a red carpet for the killers. Make the FBI enforce the law, instead of taking away our Constitutional rights..

Jimmy MacAfee

Anyone Fakebook bans, or whom Google shunts and shuns (Gifford?) or is banned by Twitter or Instagram will have their 2nd Amendment rights eliminated. That’s why red flag laws are ridiculous – who makes the decision to rescind the right to bear arms? (Mark Schmuckerberg, the “reptilian” entity?) Google the Red Chinese military enablers? The same who won’t help our military?

Will Google decide who is to be red-flagged?

Jimmy MacAfee

They should have taken away our guns first, before showing their hand through YouTube and Fakebook censorship: now we know who they intend to red-flag, don’t we?


With any luck this idiotic fat pig will stroke out long before she gets anywhere NEAR running for public office again.

John Jerome Pyskaty

She can not run. The best she can do is a slow waddle.

Scroll to top